I mean for whatever sport championships there are tennis, boxing, basketball, pro-wrestling or any sport sometimes champions will get full privilege, partial privilege and no privilege.
2 questions:
How does any federation of any game decide which of the 3 privileges a champion gets?
Sometimes tournaments are called championships. Sometimes tournaments have privilege for the previous tournament winner/championship. What is the point of calling a tournament a championship if the champion doesn't have any privilege?
Question for this meta post: How do you suggest I go about asking the above?
Guess re my question #1: I believe this is on-topic. I believe the cases vary by boxing, basketball, tennis and pro-wrestling. In boxing (damn I forgot to mention this), some champions absolutely do get privilege. In basketball, it seems champions don't really get privilege. I just wanna know what's up with that.
Guess re my question #2: I...guess this is on-topic. And if so, then well I thought #2 would be like an easy to follow up to #1 but well guess I'll have to split it?
P.S. Philip Kendall says
"Is that always the case in [...] csgo and valorant?" is most definitely asking about e-sports.
Oh drat it's supposed to be 'or' instead of 'and'. I said
Is that always the case in basketball, csgo and valorant?
I meant
Is that always the case in basketball, csgo or valorant?
Csgo and valorant are just examples anyway. For this SE site, I don't care what the answer is for csgo or valorant.