Timeline for Rules questions with "little" effort. Do we close these questions as off-topic or downvote?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
8 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 13, 2017 at 12:55 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
replaced http://sports.stackexchange.com/ with https://sports.stackexchange.com/
|
|
| Jan 11, 2017 at 13:19 | comment | added | user527 | The part about welcoming users, particularly new ones, is to help guide them. I wouldn't write them off after one low-quality question. If it's a pattern, I see your point. | |
| Jan 11, 2017 at 13:19 | comment | added | user527 | @Coach-D I completely agree. SO would be harsher. That said, we're not SO and some sites have implemented parts of their scope that isn't in line with the SE we are familiar with (eg, research requests are appropriate on some sites). My point here is that we should treat every question (of similar type and quality) the same. | |
| Jan 11, 2017 at 8:23 | comment | added | Coach-D | I a not sure where you are coming from about welcoming users. If there were questions of this low of quality on SO ... jesus we were angels compared to the responses you get there. Why would their be different expectations on different SE sites? | |
| Dec 22, 2016 at 13:15 | history | edited | user527 | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
deleted 2 characters in body
|
| Dec 20, 2016 at 21:05 | comment | added | Philip Kendall Mod | It's probably worth noting that Exhibit B currently has 4 reopen votes (full disclosure: one of them is mine), so could be re-opened soon. I'm not sure how we best deal with this where 5 users think a question should be closed and 5 think strongly enough it should be re-opened to vote for it. The last thing we should be doing is playing ping-pong with it. | |
| Dec 20, 2016 at 18:52 | history | edited | user527 | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 105 characters in body
|
| Dec 20, 2016 at 18:47 | history | answered | user527 | CC BY-SA 3.0 |