Timeline for Question about general improvement path
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
5 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 13, 2017 at 12:55 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
replaced http://sports.stackexchange.com/ with https://sports.stackexchange.com/
|
|
| Jun 4, 2016 at 8:49 | vote | accept | phihag | ||
| Jun 4, 2016 at 8:49 | |||||
| May 23, 2016 at 2:29 | comment | added | user527 | I'm not keen on criticizing the answer, but agree with the list of "better questions." For these kind of questions, an answer that provides an outline is completely acceptable, and the bullet points provide that. From there, the OP can explore the bullet points, then ask more specific questions from there (thus, creating more useful content). These are similar to how can I get started in a sport? questions in which those are inherently broad. | |
| May 22, 2016 at 23:00 | comment | added | phihag |
The question I get asked is How do I become a better Badminton player?, and this is one (India-focused) instance. Lots of the organizational stuff is completely irrelevant for an answer. Similarly, equipment or specific skills are not the point here, especially not equipment unrelated to training. I think that splitting it up into many small questions would miss the point, and make it practically impossible that somebody gets a coherent picture (unless there is a meta question or tag wiki connecting the various questions), even if they would manage to find the question.
|
|
| May 22, 2016 at 22:36 | history | answered | Philip KendallMod | CC BY-SA 3.0 |