Timeline for Why was this question considered too broad?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
5 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 27, 2014 at 13:42 | comment | added | user527 | That's fine. I don't believe the question asks for a "full" research analysis, but perhaps, as you say in the original question, a set of objective statistics to support/disprove his theory. That is similar to the nature of this question. Thanks for your opinion and response. | |
| Aug 27, 2014 at 13:38 | comment | added | TrueDub | I believe that if you need an explanation, you ask, but if you want a full research analysis, you do it yourself. The world is full of different opinions - I expressed mine, you've expressed yours, and I'm happy to agree to differ. | |
| Aug 27, 2014 at 13:31 | comment | added | user527 | This question required some research as did this question as I did not know the reason behind each circumstance, although I was previously familiar with each concept. Were they wrong to ask? What's stopping them from doing the research? Why did they expect/ask others to do so? Because this is an expert Q&A site and there are others here who are interested and have enough knowledge and such to provide an answer. | |
| Aug 27, 2014 at 13:28 | comment | added | user527 | I disagree with the statement, "What's stopping you doing the research? Why expect/ask others to do so?" There are many questions here that require some sort of expertise (and/or most times, research) to formulate an adequate and accurate answer. The OP did his part in providing background for the question, so was it wrong for him to expect someone on here with some background/knowledge/expertise of his sport/subject matter to provide an answer? | |
| Aug 27, 2014 at 10:45 | history | answered | TrueDub | CC BY-SA 3.0 |