Timeline for Why was this question considered too broad?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
7 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 13, 2017 at 12:55 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
replaced http://sports.stackexchange.com/ with https://sports.stackexchange.com/
|
|
| Jun 4, 2015 at 13:36 | history | edited | user527 |
edited tags
|
|
| Sep 7, 2014 at 2:48 | answer | added | Joe | timeline score: 2 | |
| Aug 27, 2014 at 13:45 | comment | added | user527 | In regards to the statement, "is the closing of the question simply a reflection of the downvoters'/closers' inability and/or lack of desire to provide an answer?" There were five close votes from the community. That reflects the closing of the question. As far as the downvoters "inability and/or lack of desire," that is their right to use their downvotes as they please, but it should ideally align with how downvotes are to be used. | |
| Aug 27, 2014 at 13:33 | comment | added | user527 | A recent and similar question with a similar fate found here: meta.sports.stackexchange.com/questions/533/… | |
| Aug 27, 2014 at 10:45 | answer | added | TrueDub | timeline score: -2 | |
| Aug 27, 2014 at 4:50 | history | asked | Reinstate Monica 2331977 | CC BY-SA 3.0 |