Timeline for How can we get more activity?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
5 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 28, 2016 at 19:06 | comment | added | user527 | 5) Pretty much the same analysis that we have now. The statistics point investigates research for these kind of questions; 6) I provided a similar stance for fantasy sports, but was shot down. I doubt those questions can work even with objective stats because as you state, it is still essentially an opinion, and it is prone to speculation/predicting the future. | |
| Mar 28, 2016 at 19:03 | comment | added | user527 | An analysis of these points almost four years later: 1) Pretty much the bulk of our content on Sports SE; 2) Point taken; 3) Determined to be off-topic; 4) Less interesting how? Equipment choice can be very important based on the athlete's sport and skill level, and thus, would be expertise-driven; | |
| May 18, 2012 at 19:23 | comment | added | Michael Myers Mod | Not completely sure about equipment - I'm inclined to allow them, but they seem to languish without answers, and that makes them useful to no one at all. | |
| May 18, 2012 at 18:40 | comment | added | Michael Myers Mod | Fantasy sports I can sort of agree on. But most of the fantasy questions I can think of off the top of my head would be too localized (e.g. "Should I start X or Y this week?"). | |
| May 18, 2012 at 18:08 | history | answered | Will Cole | CC BY-SA 3.0 |