Skip to main content
added 222 characters in body
Source Link
wax eagle
  • 9.2k
  • 15
  • 16

No.

Its a general reference question that can be answered in 2 second on Google (first link gives a full history).

These kinds of questions are discouraged across the network as poor examples of expert Q&A.

I am not opposed to trivia questions in general, however they should be sufficiently obscure that they merit more than copy/pasting the first site that comes up on Google. They need an angle that makes them expert Q&A.

No.

Its a general reference question that can be answered in 2 second on Google (first link gives a full history).

These kinds of questions are discouraged across the network as poor examples of expert Q&A.

No.

Its a general reference question that can be answered in 2 second on Google (first link gives a full history).

These kinds of questions are discouraged across the network as poor examples of expert Q&A.

I am not opposed to trivia questions in general, however they should be sufficiently obscure that they merit more than copy/pasting the first site that comes up on Google. They need an angle that makes them expert Q&A.

Source Link
wax eagle
  • 9.2k
  • 15
  • 16

No.

Its a general reference question that can be answered in 2 second on Google (first link gives a full history).

These kinds of questions are discouraged across the network as poor examples of expert Q&A.