For one thing, as the answer points out, its an abysmally small sample, there isn't really anything we can learn from the data.
More importantly though, there really isn't a way to tease out a narrative from comparing two country's PK experiences. The best we can do is say
- Sample size warning
- Stats show PK shootouts are crapshoots
Neither of those things is particularly interesting, and more importantly, neither of those support the preconceived desired narrative of the question itself.
Essentially, the question is "map a story onto this random statistical anomaly" and I (personally at least), don't find that to be a particularly compelling style of question.