I'd like to try to salvage another user's question, by addressing more precisely the topic, since the original one apparently is too vague to be answered.

Am I supposed to edit his question, or to write a new one?

  • 2
    Edit. Edit. Edit. – user527 Jul 30 '13 at 18:42
  • @edmastermind29 edited, thanks – o0'. Jul 30 '13 at 19:11
  • @edmastermind29 mmh, edited, but as long as the question is still closed, it doesn't help… – o0'. Jul 31 '13 at 11:01
  • That's when reopen votes are used. – user527 Jul 31 '13 at 13:00
  • @edmastermind29 you, as a mod, can re-open it, and let the community decide if to close it again or not. – o0'. Jul 31 '13 at 13:04
  • So, because you say I can reopen it, I should reopen it? If it gets another vote or two, I'll reopen it. I would like to see the community agree with this move as well. – user527 Jul 31 '13 at 13:16
  • @edmastermind29 I was just suggesting, since you suggested me to edit it. No big deal – o0'. Jul 31 '13 at 13:20
  • Right. Nothing wrong with editing, because your edit improves the question. – user527 Jul 31 '13 at 13:21
  • 1
    The question has been reopened! – user527 Aug 1 '13 at 13:39

Searching(1) the internet, using this query: oldest sport in the world will yield:

enter image description here


This question could've easily been closed as NARQ.

(1): Google

  • I thought this made sense, but I thought a bit more about it and now I don't agree any more. While the original question was bad for this very reason, my subsequent edit has a very precise definition, and the answer to that isn't obvious (nor answered by that link). – o0'. Jul 31 '13 at 11:01

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .