Mistu4u asked a question: What are the reasons that cricket is not included in the Olympics?
The community seems to be split on the constructivity of this question.
Is this question constructive/not constructive and why?
DISCLAIMER:- This is entirely based on my personal opinion.Individuals may or may not agree with my opinion.
Quoting directly the reasons for a question being closed as "Not Constructive":
As it currently stands, this question is not a good fit for our Q&A format. We expect answers to be supported by facts, references, or specific expertise, but this question will likely solicit debate, arguments, polling, or extended discussion. If you feel that this question can be improved and possibly reopened, see the FAQ for guidance.
But your answer seems to be totally objective and backed up by proper references and I see mo more answers till now to this question. So it has not given birth to opinions either. Extended discussions have also not been raised.
I personally think vote for being "Not Constructive" should be cast by any community user when he can see several answers have been posted to one single question and each one of them contains speculations, personal opinions and discussions without any proper reference. This answer currently well describes the reason. So the question is not "Not Constructive". The question is no doubt an interesting one. So it will be a pleasure to see if anybody else can come up with another reference.