2

This question indirectly addresses an interesting topic...sports psychology.

I understand we haven't had any questions pertaining to this, but how feasible would questions on sports psychology be in regards to our scope? Would such a question be better served elsewhere?

Not asking for a decision, but more of how we, as a community, would approach it. Although it may be subjective, I see excellent research content potential with such a topic...

1

I am not sure how or why it would fit better in Skeptics.SE as it's about a particular drill/exercise/technique of table tennis.

I do see the point in raising this meta question though, since we have had issues arguing back and forth on what fits in our scope and what doesn't.

Much like yourself I see great potential in this type of questions (perhaps I am a bit biased :)) and I believe that the scope of Sports.SE should cover it.

  • I used your question as an example, but sports psychology is currently an untapped topic on this site. – user527 Aug 14 '12 at 18:58
  • No I did not argue against the sports psychology logic, just didn't see how Skeptics.SE came into the picture. – posdef Aug 14 '12 at 19:01

You must log in to answer this question.